Which case established the police's ability to enter homes without a warrant under certain conditions?

The case that established the police's ability to enter homes without a warrant under specific conditions is Brigham City v. Stuart. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that officers may enter a home without a warrant when they have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened with such injury. This ruling emphasizes the importance of protecting life and preventing harm in emergency situations.

In Brigham City v. Stuart, officers responded to a report of a loud party and witnessed a physical altercation through a window. They entered the home without a warrant, which the Court ultimately found justified due to the circumstances. This decision highlighted the exception to the warrant requirement based on exigent circumstances, where immediate action is necessary to protect lives or prevent the destruction of evidence.

Other cases mentioned do not primarily deal with the issue of warrantless entry under exigent circumstances. For example, Miranda v. Arizona addresses the rights of individuals during police interrogations, Chimel v. California involves search incident to arrest within a home, and United States v. Wade concerns the right to counsel during pretrial identification. Thus, Brigham City v. Stuart stands as the landmark decision regarding the conditions under which police can enter a home