Which case addressed the issues regarding the reasonableness of vehicle searches during arrests?

The case that addressed the issues regarding the reasonableness of vehicle searches during arrests is Arizona v. Gant. This landmark decision clarified the rules surrounding the search of a vehicle following an arrest. Specifically, the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement officers may only search a vehicle after the occupant has been arrested if it is reasonable to believe that the arrestee might access the vehicle at the time of the search or if there is evidence of a crime within the vehicle.

This ruling emphasized the importance of balancing the need for officer safety and the preservation of evidence against individuals' Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. Consequently, Gant established a more precise standard for vehicle searches, ensuring that they are conducted within a reasonable scope based on the circumstances of each arrest, thus shaping how police conduct searches in relation to vehicle access and potential evidence.

The other cases mentioned address different aspects of law enforcement and constitutional rights but do not specifically tackle the reasonableness of vehicle searches related to arrests in the way Gant does.