What right was established in Escobedo v. Illinois regarding police interrogations?

The case of Escobedo v. Illinois established the right to counsel during police interrogations. In this landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a suspect has the constitutional right to have an attorney present during questioning once the individual has requested counsel. This ruling emphasizes the importance of legal representation in ensuring that a suspect's rights are protected during potentially coercive police interrogations.

The significance of this ruling lies in its recognition that the right to counsel is fundamental to fair legal proceedings. It safeguards against self-incrimination and helps prevent abuses of power by law enforcement. Without the opportunity for legal counsel, suspects may be more vulnerable to making statements that could be misinterpreted or used against them in court, thereby threatening the integrity of the judicial process.

In contrast, the other options address various rights that are critical to the criminal justice system but are not specifically linked to police interrogations in the same manner as the right to counsel established in Escobedo v. Illinois. The right to remain silent, while important, is part of the broader context of the Fifth Amendment, and the right to a speedy trial and the right to be informed of charges play roles at different stages in the legal process, rather than during the interrogation phase where legal representation is