In which case did the Supreme Court address the admissibility of confessions obtained under duress?

The Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of confessions obtained under duress in Brown v. Mississippi. In this landmark case, the Court found that confessions obtained through physical violence and coercion were inadmissible in court, thus establishing a crucial precedent for the protection of defendants’ rights against self-incrimination and ensuring that confessions are made voluntarily. The ruling emphasized that due process requires confessions to be derived from free and rational will, rather than from coercive tactics that would undermine the integrity of the criminal justice system. This case highlighted the importance of protecting individuals from abusive practices during police interrogations and reaffirmed the constitutional guarantees of fair treatment under the law.