In which case did the Supreme Court rule on the issue of officers' rights when attending private property?

The case of Florida v. Jardines is significant because it addresses the issue of police officers' rights when entering private property, particularly concerning the Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that using a drug detection dog on the front porch of a home constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that officers do not have an implied license to enter private property for the purpose of conducting a search, as they would if they were simply engaging with the public in a way that respects social norms.

This ruling emphasizes that the sanctity of a person's home extends to the area immediately surrounding it, or curtilage, which is considered private space. Therefore, officers must have probable cause, consent, or a warrant before conducting searches in such areas, underscoring the importance of privacy rights in residential settings.

The other cases listed deal with different aspects of law enforcement practices and constitutional rights, such as electronic surveillance or searches related to arrests, but do not focus on the context of officers entering private property in the same way.